[Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 29 December 2004]
I have been an acucobol user for many years. In my menu program which calls all other programs I use set environment to use vision 3 files in my application. I am now installing a user of my application whose files will be large. Would I be better off performance wise or for any other reason using a later version of vision?Page 1 / 1
[Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 29 December 2004]
I have been an acucobol user for many years. In my menu program which calls all other programs I use set environment to use vision 3 files in my application. I am now installing a user of my application whose files will be large. Would I be better off performance wise or for any other reason using a later version of vision?Also, if you're under unix you'll want to check your system ulimit also.
[Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 29 December 2004]
I have been an acucobol user for many years. In my menu program which calls all other programs I use set environment to use vision 3 files in my application. I am now installing a user of my application whose files will be large. Would I be better off performance wise or for any other reason using a later version of vision?[Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 29 December 2004]
I have been an acucobol user for many years. In my menu program which calls all other programs I use set environment to use vision 3 files in my application. I am now installing a user of my application whose files will be large. Would I be better off performance wise or for any other reason using a later version of vision?Rob
[Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 29 December 2004]
I have been an acucobol user for many years. In my menu program which calls all other programs I use set environment to use vision 3 files in my application. I am now installing a user of my application whose files will be large. Would I be better off performance wise or for any other reason using a later version of vision?Another option is to keep the majority of your files in vision 3 and just convert the vary large files to visiion 4/5. Vutil utility will let you convert vision versions on a file.
[Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 29 December 2004]
I have been an acucobol user for many years. In my menu program which calls all other programs I use set environment to use vision 3 files in my application. I am now installing a user of my application whose files will be large. Would I be better off performance wise or for any other reason using a later version of vision?With a Windows 2003 server and windows stations ( W2003, 2000, XP ) :
The results are very diff?rents if I am using Network or not and if i am using W(XP/2000/2003) or W98
in some case, using vision 5 files is 50% slower than vision 3 with the same runtime. !!!
I have not yet checked on a Linux or Unix pateforme..
In fact, It seems that the OPEN FILE verb is very the slowest.
I join a Excel sheet with the result ... take a look
PS : You have to rename the file with an xls extension
[Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 29 December 2004]
I have been an acucobol user for many years. In my menu program which calls all other programs I use set environment to use vision 3 files in my application. I am now installing a user of my application whose files will be large. Would I be better off performance wise or for any other reason using a later version of vision?When I spoke with AcuCorp about this over the summer, they assured me that there are no plans to discontinue supporting VV3 format.
Rob
Sign up
Already have an account? Login
Welcome to the Rocket Forum!
Please log in or register:
Employee Login | Registration Member Login | RegistrationEnter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.