iCluster deletes LF objects on the target and sync check flags them as not found NFD
I have an ongoing issue. Yes, I do have a case opened with Rocket Support, but I thought I would reach out to the user community on this topic to see if anyone else has run into this.
We have over 125 PAIRS of IBM i LPARs, production (source) and DR (target) pairs. That's a LOT of systems all running iCluster replication! They all run basically the same application. I am having an issue with one specific pair of source/target lpars when it comes to LFs being replicated.
Our application has MANY LFs. In this specific source/target pair, there are about 30 LFs that refuse to play nicely with iCluster. They are flagged as OOS (out of sync) in the Latency screen (option 81 on the target side) with an NFD (not found) code. This is the ONLY pair of systems that has an issue with this subset of LFs.
What have I done? Well, I run a DMSNDOBJ (send object) on the source system to send the objects over to the target system. I then do a WRKOBJ on the target system to make sure that the objects did, in fact, make it over to the target. They are there. At some point during the day, the objects disappear from the target system. I once suspected that the sync check (which we run overnight) was deleting them. It wasn't. I tried putting a HOLD on my sync check job on the IBM job scheduler and the objects still disappeared from the target.
I've gone around and around with my rep at Rocket support and we tried a lot of different things. Running DMINZNODE, playing with the various options defined on the groups, and the various iCluster-wide system values, but to no avail. We cannot prevent these LF objects from being deleted from the target system and becoming flagged as OOS on the monitor screen.
Has anyone run into a similar situation like this before? If so, any suggestions as to what to do? The last piece of advice I was given by Rocket support was to do a manual refresh of the whole library using virtual tape. Due to the size of the library, that is not a feasible thing to do, especially since there is no guarantee that these files will still have the same issue.
Thoughts?
Thanks for reading.
Sonia
------------------------------
Sonia Dodov-Maloney
Director Of Global Information Technology
Computer Guidance Corporation
Scottsdale AZ US
------------------------------
We have over 125 PAIRS of IBM i LPARs, production (source) and DR (target) pairs. That's a LOT of systems all running iCluster replication! They all run basically the same application. I am having an issue with one specific pair of source/target lpars when it comes to LFs being replicated.
Our application has MANY LFs. In this specific source/target pair, there are about 30 LFs that refuse to play nicely with iCluster. They are flagged as OOS (out of sync) in the Latency screen (option 81 on the target side) with an NFD (not found) code. This is the ONLY pair of systems that has an issue with this subset of LFs.
What have I done? Well, I run a DMSNDOBJ (send object) on the source system to send the objects over to the target system. I then do a WRKOBJ on the target system to make sure that the objects did, in fact, make it over to the target. They are there. At some point during the day, the objects disappear from the target system. I once suspected that the sync check (which we run overnight) was deleting them. It wasn't. I tried putting a HOLD on my sync check job on the IBM job scheduler and the objects still disappeared from the target.
I've gone around and around with my rep at Rocket support and we tried a lot of different things. Running DMINZNODE, playing with the various options defined on the groups, and the various iCluster-wide system values, but to no avail. We cannot prevent these LF objects from being deleted from the target system and becoming flagged as OOS on the monitor screen.
Has anyone run into a similar situation like this before? If so, any suggestions as to what to do? The last piece of advice I was given by Rocket support was to do a manual refresh of the whole library using virtual tape. Due to the size of the library, that is not a feasible thing to do, especially since there is no guarantee that these files will still have the same issue.
Thoughts?
Thanks for reading.
Sonia
------------------------------
Sonia Dodov-Maloney
Director Of Global Information Technology
Computer Guidance Corporation
Scottsdale AZ US
------------------------------
Sign up
Already have an account? Login
Welcome to the Rocket Forum!
Please log in or register:
Employee Login | Registration Member Login | RegistrationEnter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
