Skip to main content

[archive] Difficulties with Citrix - experiences with newer acucobol versions?

  • July 29, 2008
  • 2 replies
  • 0 views
D

[Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 28 July 2008]

Hello,

we often have difficulties with our citrix-servers in connection with acucobol ( Hangups and delays ). We don't know if the citrix-system doesn't work correctly or if the hangups of our system are created by acucobol. We use acucobol 5.2. We are told to try to use a newer version of acucobol. But this costs a lot of money. Is there anyone who has experiences whether we can hope that our system will run with less problems than today when we use a newer version?

    2 replies

    D

    [Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 28 July 2008]

    Hello,

    we often have difficulties with our citrix-servers in connection with acucobol ( Hangups and delays ). We don't know if the citrix-system doesn't work correctly or if the hangups of our system are created by acucobol. We use acucobol 5.2. We are told to try to use a newer version of acucobol. But this costs a lot of money. Is there anyone who has experiences whether we can hope that our system will run with less problems than today when we use a newer version?
    Sorry to say that we have the same type issues with our software that was written in ACu 6.2. We have no issues when the users use the Acucorp Thin-Client but we have some sites that use Citrix Thin-Client machines that we can't install the Acucorp Thin-Client on and those give us lots of issues.

    If you do get a response or a fix we would love to know it also. We have been chasing this for over a year with no answers.
    D

    [Migrated content. Thread originally posted on 28 July 2008]

    Hello,

    we often have difficulties with our citrix-servers in connection with acucobol ( Hangups and delays ). We don't know if the citrix-system doesn't work correctly or if the hangups of our system are created by acucobol. We use acucobol 5.2. We are told to try to use a newer version of acucobol. But this costs a lot of money. Is there anyone who has experiences whether we can hope that our system will run with less problems than today when we use a newer version?
    Sorry to say that we have the same type issues with our software that was written in ACu 6.2. We have no issues when the users use the Acucorp Thin-Client but we have some sites that use Citrix Thin-Client machines that we can't install the Acucorp Thin-Client on and those give us lots of issues.

    If you do get a response or a fix we would love to know it also. We have been chasing this for over a year with no answers.

    Recent badge winners

    Explore all badges
    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement